Application example. The scenario below was put together from what ProdMan builds in real projects, without representing a specific client. The figures shown are project estimates and vary with the size of the archive, how organized it already is and the rules of each business.

The scenario

A law firm with a dozen professionals. Petitions, opinions, contracts and arguments piled up in network folders, personal drives and inboxes. Every lawyer with a favorite template. The guidelines for how the house works live in the partners' heads.

The practical effect shows up every day. Someone redoes a document that already existed. A new hire takes months to write in the firm's standard. A good argument sits forgotten in the folder of whoever wrote it. And when a partner goes on vacation, half the judgment goes with them.

The same pattern repeats in accounting, clinics, real estate, engineering and consulting. The content changes, the problem is the same.

Organize first, automate second

The work starts with curation, alongside the people who know the material. Defining what is official and what is a draft. Who approves. What is current and what became history. What stays out for confidentiality.

A knowledge base with wrong material inside delivers the wrong answer faster. The curation stage is what holds the project up, and it is done with the team, not in place of it.

The base holds the way the house works. The assistant answers and produces within it, with the source always in sight.

How it works

  • Sources gathered in one place: documents, templates, contracts, opinions, guidelines, manuals, spreadsheets and internal standards.
  • Curation and versioning, with the current version flagged and the history preserved.
  • AI-powered search that understands the question in plain language and returns the answer with the document and the excerpt backing it.
  • Assisted drafting of new material: a draft, an opinion, a proposal, a reply to a client, all following the registered templates and guidelines.
  • Access control by role, area and client, respecting confidentiality and the internal structure.
  • A base that grows: every approved piece of material goes back into the archive and improves the answers that follow.

What you can analyze with it

With the archive organized, the operation becomes data. Which topics the team looks up most. Where material is missing and the answer does not exist. Which document types consume the most time. Which clients concentrate a given demand.

That feeds hiring, training, pricing and business priority decisions, with numbers instead of perception.

How we thought about the risks

The material here is sensitive and the answer has to be trustworthy. The design accounts for that from day one.

  • An answer without a source does not go out. Every output points to the document and the excerpt backing it.
  • Generated content starts as a draft and goes through human review before reaching a client or a case file.
  • Permissions respected in both search and drafting. Whoever cannot access the document does not get an answer based on it.
  • Professional confidentiality and data protection law handled in the design, with the option to run the solution inside the client's own environment.
  • Continuous curation. A revoked document leaves circulation and stops influencing answers.
Estimated gains
  • An answer in seconds instead of digging through folders, emails and old conversations
  • First draft of a standard document out in minutes, with human review before anything is sent
  • New hires producing in the house standard within days instead of months
  • The way of working preserved when someone leaves the team or someone new joins
  • Figures are project estimates, calibrated during the diagnostic against each company's real archive

What the company needs to have

  • The archive, even if it is disorganized and scattered across folders, drives and inboxes.
  • Someone with the authority to say what is official and what stays out.
  • An access policy, however simple, about who sees what.

How this becomes a project

It starts with the free 45-minute diagnostic, to size the archive, the confidentiality requirements and the priorities. The build happens as a Short Project of 3 to 6 weeks, starting with one area or one document type that already delivers a visible gain. The base then grows in stages, with the client team feeding and operating it. Delivered with documentation, training and a 90-day warranty.

Next example
Real estate search in plain language →
Back
← All cases